Krista
09-15-2008, 11:14 PM
My apologies for the delay in posting this thread as this article ran on the front page of The Star Phoenix on Sat Sept. 6th.
Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep . . ."
http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/story.html?id=85030a9b-f7a1-4457-89dd-d2c13bc76e2b&k=15758
As I type this email, I am conflicted about this article. The content of this article is wonderful but I'm heartbroken by the editors choice/reason for not including Aedan's picture. Please don't get me wrong, I am so pleased to see NILMDTS on the front page of my local newspaper. NILMDTS does phenominal work for bereaved parents, and hopefully the positive exposure can help to recruit new photographers and introduce the public to this organization.
I am not sure why the article online doesn't show the two pictures; the front page was a picture of me looking at my beautiful pictures of Aedan (unfortunately you cannot see Aedan's pictures) and the second picture is of Cheryl craddling Maddux. Originally the story was to include a picture of Aedan and naturally I was upset to see the final result - no picture of Aedan. After making an inquiry with the Star Phoenix on the logic for omiting the picture of Aedan, I was given two reasons. The first reason was limited space, only able to run two pictures and they felt it was important to include a picture of the co-founder, and I don't disagree. The second reason was the content of Aedan's picture may have OFFENDED some readers, and they wanted to ensure the content of the story received the attention it deserved...so basically they protected their sensitive readers from my son's picture. I'm trying not to be an overly sensitive mommy, but needless to say I disgusted to hear someone even use the word offend when making reference to Aedan's pictures. My perception is by not including Aedan's picture they perpetuated the negative stigma attached to our babies pictures. Makes me wonder, did they even understand the story??
I'm sorry for ranting...thanks for listening.
Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep . . ."
http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/story.html?id=85030a9b-f7a1-4457-89dd-d2c13bc76e2b&k=15758
As I type this email, I am conflicted about this article. The content of this article is wonderful but I'm heartbroken by the editors choice/reason for not including Aedan's picture. Please don't get me wrong, I am so pleased to see NILMDTS on the front page of my local newspaper. NILMDTS does phenominal work for bereaved parents, and hopefully the positive exposure can help to recruit new photographers and introduce the public to this organization.
I am not sure why the article online doesn't show the two pictures; the front page was a picture of me looking at my beautiful pictures of Aedan (unfortunately you cannot see Aedan's pictures) and the second picture is of Cheryl craddling Maddux. Originally the story was to include a picture of Aedan and naturally I was upset to see the final result - no picture of Aedan. After making an inquiry with the Star Phoenix on the logic for omiting the picture of Aedan, I was given two reasons. The first reason was limited space, only able to run two pictures and they felt it was important to include a picture of the co-founder, and I don't disagree. The second reason was the content of Aedan's picture may have OFFENDED some readers, and they wanted to ensure the content of the story received the attention it deserved...so basically they protected their sensitive readers from my son's picture. I'm trying not to be an overly sensitive mommy, but needless to say I disgusted to hear someone even use the word offend when making reference to Aedan's pictures. My perception is by not including Aedan's picture they perpetuated the negative stigma attached to our babies pictures. Makes me wonder, did they even understand the story??
I'm sorry for ranting...thanks for listening.